“There are only three rules for
writing. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are.”
“The only rule for writing is to
write well.”
Just mention the word “rules” in
the company of writers, and those are the first declarations they’re likely to
toss back at you.
I don’t know about authors in other
genres, but mystery writers tend to get worked up over the very notion that
they should write according to rules or, to use a less inflammatory term, the
time-honored conventions of the genre. They’re different! They write the way
they want to write! They reject all
restrictions on their creativity! They hate the idea of “writing to a formula”
and believe that rules equal formula.
But when I look at their work, I
see that all of them stick to the time-honored conventions. They follow the
rules. At least the ones who are published and have an audience do.
I’m not talking about the brilliant
literary writers who blend genres and dazzle us with their unique vision and
word play. I’m talking about authors who label themselves
mystery/suspense/thriller writers and are aiming their work at that audience.
Genre readers have certain
expectations. We can stretch the limits, get creative and tinker with the genre
conventions, but if we ignore them entirely, we have left the crime fiction
genre and started writing something else.
All crime fiction, from cozies to psychological
suspense to gory thrillers, is driven by the same questions:
What terrible thing has or is going
to happen?
Why?
Who is responsible?
Who will stop the villain, and how?
Most crime fiction has a classic
three-act structure: beginning, middle, end. Some crime novels begin slowly,
some shoot out of the gate on the first page, but most have building action and
suspense toward the end, preparing the reader for a resolution and revelation. Crime
fiction writers all realize that without conflict they have no story.
Beyond those basics, each subgenre
has its own conventions — rules, whether you want to call them that or not. A
cozy, for example, can’t contain explicit sex scenes with X-rated language or detailed
descriptions of brutal violence. Every writer who has been through the agent/editor
mill knows how much weight traditional publishers place on easy categorization
of novels. If they don’t know what category it fits into — if it’s a little of
this, a little of that, not a lot of anything — they won’t know how to market
it, review publications won’t know where to place their reviews, and
booksellers won’t know which shelf to put it on. But the likelihood is that
none of those problems will arise, because it will never be published.
Self-published authors are free to
write what they please and ignore all the conventions. They still have to reach
an audience, though, and that means categorizing their novels. They may think they’re
writing mystery, but if they ignore the readers’ expectations, they won’t reach
their target audience and might provoke a lot of negative reviews from people
who do buy their work.
Bestselling authors sometimes
wander off track in their twentieth or thirtieth books, letting the suspense go
slack and writing rushed endings that outrage readers. Yet their readers will
continue buying their books. All that proves is that when you have a solid
record of great sales behind you, you can disappoint fans without driving them
away forever, because they hope you’ll be back in good form the next time out.
It doesn’t prove that ignoring readers’ expectations — aka “the rules” — will
bring success to every author.
I believe that the basic structure,
the basic conventions, of crime fiction offer tremendous freedom to the writer.
Within that structure, we can go deeply into character, create vivid worlds,
explore social issues, raise questions about life and the way we treat each
other. The need to solve or prevent a crime provides automatic conflict and
tension. With that as a starting point, we can go almost anywhere. As long as
we meet or exceed the reader’s expectations, no one is going to think about
rules or formulas. All they’ll be thinking is, “What a terrific story!”
Great post, Sandy!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Theresa.
ReplyDeleteI agree, great post. I learned to warn readers that there may be something in my books they find offensive. That has saved me a lot of trouble. But your ending nailed it. Readers want a great story. Writers hope that's what we give them.
ReplyDeletePolly, the kind of thrillers and romantic suspense you write are definitely adult material, and as long as readers understand what subgenre they're getting, they have no reason to be surprised.
ReplyDeleteExcellent!
ReplyDeleteExcellent discussion. It seems to me that the rules aren't there to restrict writers but to ensure that she has the best tools at hand to tell her story.
ReplyDelete